Comparison of noncontrast computed tomography and high field magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of Great Danes with cervical spondylomyelopathy. Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound (2014)
Informações do Resumo
Disponível em: Inglês.
Total de Páginas: 10.
Background: Computed tomography (CT) provides excellent bony detail, whereas magnetic resonance (MR) imaging issuperior in evaluating the neural structures. The purpose of this prospective study was to assess interobserverand intermethod agreement in the evaluation of cervical vertebral column morphology and lesion severity inGreat Danes with cervical spondylomyelopathy by use of noncontrast CT and high-field MR imaging. Fifteenclient-owned affected Great Danes were enrolled. All dogs underwent noncontrast CT under sedation and MRimaging under general anesthesia of the cervical vertebral column.